Second Republic Governor of Kaduna State, Alhaji Balarabe Musa, speaks on topical issues in this interview with THE PUNCH NEWSPAPER.
What do you
think about the seeming inability of the Federal Government to rescue
over 200 schoolgirls, who were abducted from Government Secondary
School, Chibok, Borno State, over two months ago?
The inability to resolve the issue of the
abduction of the schoolgirls from Chibok, Borno State, and the
continued abduction of women and children is a show of gross
incompetence on the part of the Federal Government. Apart from that,
President Goodluck Jonathan and his government went ahead to
unpatriotically invite foreigners to solve a problem that the Federal
Government has the capacity to solve. And up till today, the foreigners
have not been able to identify where the abducted children are. Nothing
concrete is coming both from the Federal Government and those invited to
help.
Some have blamed northern leaders for allowing the Boko Haram menace to fester.
It is irrelevant because the so-called
northern leaders are not the Federal Government. They cannot control any
part of the country. They are just elders, who have been identified for
their roles or age. They have no power. They don’t even have moral
authority. It is the Federal Government that has the legal power and
moral authority to face the situation. The highest authorities in the
North are the governors. Even the governors can’t do much. They are the
chief security officers of their states but they don’t control the
police, the army and other security services. They don’t even control
the funds that could have enabled them to perform.
Given the fact the Boko Haram has
claimed it’s advancing the cause of Islam, can’t northern religious
leaders, such as the emirs, negotiate with the insurgents?
First of all, it is quite clear that Boko
Haram cannot be Islamic because they are violating the fundamental
tenets of Islam and one of the tenets is the dignity of women folk. It’s
a consensus that the Boko Haram insurgents are agents that are out to
destabilise the country either by the Federal Government itself or some
band of thieves or by foreign imperialists. There is no way a sectional
group in Nigeria can mount such insurgency as the Boko Haram. They don’t
have the resources; they don’t have the cohesion or coordination. It
must be either by the Federal Government or bands of thieves in the
country, who are rich; or foreign imperialist, who have targeted Nigeria
for disintegration by 2015. These are the forces we should look at as
possible sponsors of this insurgency working towards the destabilisation
of Nigeria.
The two leading political parties
in the country, the Peoples Democratic Party and the All Progressives
Congress, have been blaming each other for the insurgency. Don’t you
think they should unite to solve the national problem?
The PDP and the APC cannot unite. One is
seeking to hold on to power at the federal level and the other wants to
take it. It’s very difficult for them to unite on any issue. In fact, as
political parties, I don’t think the PDP or the APC is capable of
mounting such an insurgency as the Boko Haram. As government in power,
certainly they can, but as a political party, I don’t think they can.
That rules out the APC from being responsible for this kind of
insurgency. The fact that the APC has been criticising the Federal
Government for failing to stop the insurgency is quite logical.
In view of the current state of
the nation, some have said it won’t be proper for the President to seek
re-election in 2015. Do you agree?
Considering the negative state of the
nation, which has affected every part of Nigeria, particularly the level
of poverty and insecurity, Jonathan should not seek re-election in
2015. His party will not even nominate him. But if it does, they will
face the consequences because Jonathan will lose the election woefully.
He will not get reasonable votes even in the South-South where he comes
from because the South-South is also suffering from the negative state
of the nation. South-South people are also suffering from the current
level of unemployment, hunger and insecurity. Jonathan’s incompetence
has affected every part of Nigeria. Without the misuse of incumbency and
money power, there is no way he can get nomination even from the PDP,
let alone winning the election.
Your party, the Peoples
Redemption Party, was among the parties deregistered by the Independent
National Electoral Commission. Now that INEC has said deregistered
parties should reapply, would your party reapply?
No, we will not reapply because we don’t
want to be part of the rubbish that INEC is doing. As far as we are
concerned, the PRP is both a movement and an electoral body. We will
continue to exist given the provisions of the Chapter 2 of the 1999
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. We will continue to
exist whether we are registered or not, whether we can contest election
or not.
The Senate recently empowered INEC to deregister political parties that fail to win any seat during general elections.
The issue of deregistration of political
parties is in complete contravention of Section 40 of the 1999
Constitution, which says in effect that INEC cannot deregister a
political party that it had already recognised. That’s one. Secondly,
one of the deregistered political parties is the Fresh Democratic Party.
The party went to court and the court declared clearly that the
deregistration of the FDP on two grounds was unconstitutional, illegal
and therefore null and void. Almost one year after the judgement was
delivered, INEC has refused to honour the judgement. This shows that
INEC is lawless. It has no respect for the laws and constitution of
Nigeria. INEC lied that it had appealed the judgement but that is not
true. All that INEC did was to give notice of an appeal. Giving notice
of an appeal is not the same thing as filing an appeal. Up till now INEC
has not filed an appeal and it has refused to allow the FDP to
participate in elections. This has an implication for other political
parties that were deregistered on the same grounds that INEC
deregistered the FDP. The two grounds on which the INEC deregistered the
Fresh Democratic Party were: one, that it did not win any election or,
at least, one seat in a state House of Assembly. The court had ruled
that that provision that a political party must win at least a seat in a
state House of Assembly was in contravention of the constitution and,
therefore, was declared null and void. On the other leg, the court ruled
that INEC did not give the political party fair hearing before
deregistering it. These grounds are applicable to all the other
political parties that were deregistered, therefore, no political party,
as of today, has been deregistered in accordance with the constitution,
yet INEC would not allow them to participate in elections. In any case,
INEC cannot conduct a free and fair election in Nigeria. First, it’s
because free, fair, and credible election in Nigeria is impossible due
to the conditions under which elections are conducted. These conditions
include first, the deciding role of money in Nigerian politics. Nobody
can win any election in Nigeria without an exorbitant amount of money.
Secondly, the misuse of incumbency at all levels of government; federal,
state and local. Thirdly, the cost charged by electoral bodies in
Nigeria is not fair. I’ll give an example with the forthcoming local
government elections in Kaduna State. The demand of the state electoral
body is that every candidate for the post of the chairman of a local
government council must pay N250,000 and everyone who wants to be a
councilor must pay N100,000. Which means money power is the deciding
factor in elections in Nigeria; therefore the elections cannot be free,
fair and transparent.
What about the Ekiti State governorship election, which was adjudged free and fair by local and foreign observers.
It’s the same falsehood that is
perpetrated through the media and various spokespersons. The Ekiti
election or any other election in Nigeria cannot be free and fair with
the influence of money power and misuse of incumbency and the excessive
involvement of the military and other security forces. A free and fair
election cannot have the level of participation of the army, police and
other security forces as well as the harassment that occurred in Ekiti
just before the election. In the Ekiti election, members of the ruling
party were free to campaign without harassment by security services but
the members of the opposition, which is the APC, were not free to
campaign in Ekiti without harassment. It went to the extent that even
the campaign manager of the incumbent governor was virtually told to
stop campaigning or face the consequence. The Ekiti election cannot in
anyway be called free and fair because it was not. But the media and
others are giving the impression that it was free and fair. It was not
free and fair. It was not even tolerable.
0 comments:
Post a Comment